heutige LVA
Samuel HöllerTechnische und methodische Grundlagen der Digitalisierung08:3010:00MZ 003A
Bernhard VielhaberTechnische und methodische Grundlagen der Digitalisierung19:0020:30MZ 003A
Fach- & Modulprüfungen
PrüfungPrüferTerminAnm. mögl. bisangem.max.RaumBemerkung
Technische und methodische Grundlagen der Digitalisierung24.04.202420.04.202449Weitere Prüfer:
Technical and Methodologcial Foundations of DigitizationHöller S.24.04.202420.04.202409Weitere Prüfer:
Technische und methodische Grundlagen der DigitalisierungHöller J.24.04.202420.04.2024132144Weitere Prüfer:
Technical and Methodologcial Foundations of DigitizationHöller S.24.04.202420.04.2024610Weitere Prüfer:
Technische und methodische Grundlagen der DigitalisierungHöller J.10.07.202406.07.2024070Weitere Prüfer:
Technical and Methodologcial Foundations of DigitizationHöller S.10.07.202406.07.202400Weitere Prüfer:

New publication on the use of neuroscientific methods in software engineering research

Review of research on the use of neuroscientific methods in software engineering published in the Journal of Systems and Software

The term “NeuroSE” refers to a research domain, which focuses on the use of neuroscientific methods in software engineering. The current status of research in this domain is reviewed in an article that was recently published in the Journal of Systems and Software. Authors of this article are Barbara Weber of the University of St. Gallen, Thomas Fischer (IDB, JKU) and René Riedl (JKU and University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria).

The article reviews the current status of NeuroSE research based on 89 publications of which 47 are finished empirical studies. The neuroscientific data collection methods used in these studies range from techniques to measure brain activity (e.g., functional magnetic resonance imaging or fMRI, electroencephalography or EEG and functional near-infrared spectroscopy or fNIRS) over techniques to measure heart activity (e.g., electrocardiogram or ECG) to techniques to measure skin conductivity (e.g., electrodermal activity or EDA) or unconscious movements of the eye (eyetracking).

The systematic analysis of the literature allowed to draw a number of conclusions regarding the contribution that these methods can make to software engineering, including:

  • enhancing our understanding of human factors in software engineering (e.g., the tasks that are particularly difficult for a specific software developer)
  •  can inform the development of techniques to improve the development of software (e.g., to support code comprehension)
  • understanding the use of software systems and provide insights into how software is perceived by their users (e.g., to identify functionalities that are particularly difficult to understand for users)
  • Neurophysiological measurements can be used to develop so-called neuro-adaptive systems, software systems that are able to adapt to the mental state of their users (e.g., to simplify the user interface during periods of high cognitive load)

The article is open access and therefore available for free. Please follow this LINK to the article.

New Survey Instrument for the Measurement of Digital Stress: The Digital Stressors Scale (DSS)

New survey instrument to measure digital stress presented: The Digital Stressors Scale (DSS)

In a recent publication, Dr. Thomas Fischer and his colleagues Dr. Martin Reuter (University of Bonn) and Dr. René Riedl (University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria and JKU) have presented a new survey instrument to measure digital stress. The new instrument comprises 50 questions which ask individuals about their perceptions of stress caused directly or indirectly by digital technologies at work. These 50 questions are arranged in 10 categories, which reflect specific stressors, including:

  • Complexity of technology
  • Conflicts between work and private life
  • Job insecurity
  • Privacy of technology use
  • Overload
  • Technology safety
  • Pressure from the social environment
  • Lack of technical support
  • Lack of technology usefulness
  • Technology unreliability

The new instrument was tested with a sample of 1,998 individuals representative of the employed population in the USA. The article and the new survey instrument are now available in a new open access article published in the journal “Frontiers of Psychology” titled: The Digital Stressors Scale: Development and Validation of a New Survey Instrument to Measure Digital Stress Perceptions in the Workplace Context.

Further information on digital stress, its origins and measurement can be found on the website digital-stress.info.

Johannes Kepler University hosts second PERFORM Training Week

Johannes Kepler University hosts second PERFORM Training Week

Linz, a European Capital of Culture, was the destination of our next stop in the Marie Curie Project PERFORM. JKU hosted the Second Official Training Week, focusing on the significance of Customer Experience within retailing. It was an intense week with innovative workshops, interactive company visits and interesting presentations & lectures from guest speakers Fred Davis (Texas, USA) and Pierre-Majorique Léger (Montréal, Canada), who, together with host René Riedl (JKU), provided state-of-the-art insights into topics such as Technology Adoption, NeuroIS and Customer Experience Measurements. On top of that, inside views into legal aspects showed the extent of the disruption of the retail industry, rounding out the various dimensions of topics in our project.

Members of the PERFORM consortium

It was a rewarding and challenging event, demonstrating again successfully how the Early Stage Researchers evolve throughout their individual projects and are able to contribute to each other and to the overall goal in becoming a pioneer in future retailing.

Many thanks to everyone joining and helping together. We are awaiting everyone to our annual gathering in Dublin in October this year, with an extraordinary programme!